A. Samad Khan, M. Ehtesham ul Haque, A. Ahmed Khan, S. Izhar ul haque, S. Obaidullah, M. Umer Khan
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 26 (2024). pp. 2-37
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.26.2
ISSN 2301-1092 • ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 – Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 6
the facility. Researchers and designers introduced some software to make energy-efficient systems. But the problem
with this software is it doesn’t completely fit the real-time data and the real-time data is something else that is different
from the built-in values of the software. This is the reason why when researchers design a particular system that is only
based on software and no manual method is used, there must be an error [14].
There are several ways to determine the cooling load of space. Some methods such as CLTD, CLF, SCL, and HAP
(Transfer Function) are being used for cooling load calculation. Each of these methods possesses a different and unique
methodological approach for calculating space cooling load. CLTD and HAP methods will be discussed in this paper
[15].
CLTD is widely used for manual cooling load calculation, as proposed by ASHRAE. This method is used to calculate
space cooling loads in which heat-dissipating devices are present. It is also used to calculate the load due to heat
dissipation from the walls, windows, and roofs in the space [16]. For walls and roofs, CLTD uses the concept of heat
transfer temperature difference but for internal load and windows, it uses CLF [17]. The tabulated CLTD and CLF data
were calculated using the transfer function method, which yielded cooling loads for standard environmental conditions
and zone types. The cooling loads for each component are then summed to obtain the total zone cooling load [18]. The
cooling load of an auditorium space is determined using the CLTD/CLF method, developed as a manual calculation
technique relying on tabulated CLTD and CLF values. These tabulated data were derived using the transfer function
method, providing cooling load estimates for typical environmental conditions and zone types. These loads were
subsequently standardized for easy hourly calculation by designers through normalization. Total zone cooling load is
computed by summing the cooling loads of individual components.
HAP is a powerful computer-based tool developed by Carrier Corporation, designed for consulting engineers, HVAC
contractors, facility engineers, and other professionals involved in the design and analysis of commercial building
HVAC systems. The HAP uses the ASHRAE Transfer Function Method (TFM) for system load calculations and
detailed 8,760 hour-by-hour simulation techniques for energy analysis. The TFM uses transfer functions to model
transient heat transfer equations [19].
The two major functions of HAP are:
1. Estimating load and designing systems
2. Performing Energy and Cost analysis
The HAP software uses a specific built-in program called the “HAP System Design Load” program to calculate, design,
and size the HVAC system. The following are some features of this program:
Calculates design cooling and heating loads for spaces, zones, and coils in the HVAC system.
Determines required airflow rates for spaces, zones, and the system.
Sizes cooling and heating coils.
Sizes air circulation fans.
Sizes chillers and boilers.
Some previous case studies were performed by different researchers for cooling load calculation of particular facilities
by different methods and there is a significant result variation after validation by researchers which leads to an
inappropriate design of the HVAC system. ALameen awad Alameen et al. [20] performed a study related to the
designing of an Air Conditioning System for a Sports Hall, with a capacity of 1000 occupants in Sudan by using CLTD
and HAP methods. The results obtained from CLTD and HAP were 116 TR and 103 TR respectively, with a percentage
error of 13%. Khakre et al. [21] conducted a study for cooling load calculation that incorporates the CLTD method for
an evaporative cooling system. The cooling load obtained from the CLTD method was 42.35 TR and from the HAP
program, it was 38.6 TR, contributing an error of 9% which is not allowed to design an accurate HVAC system. These
variations of calculated cooling load from two different methods make it impossible to design an accurate HVAC
system.
Based on cooling load calculation, all previous research studies are focused on designing of HVAC system for any
facility by using the CLTD method and HAP software. The purpose of this research study is to design and propose
different possible HVAC systems for the University Auditorium. A Central Air Conditioning system is already
installed in the Auditorium which is DX – type system. An HVAC system that is currently being operated has exceeded
the lifespan of twenty years and Refrigerant R-22 (Chloro-Difluoro-Methane) is currently being used and has been
obsolete due to high GWP and ODP values. In the existing HVAC system, R-22 enters AHU and cools the air without
the need for secondary refrigerant but it’s a danger zone for occupants if the refrigerant piping leaks for some reason,
it will directly be mixed with cool air and goes into the space where potential health hazards for occupants will be
taken place. So, R-22 (Freon) is not suitable for the cause rather it will be harmful to the occupants. To the knowledge
of the authors, no study is available that proposed new HVAC systems with the refrigerant R-410 (A) for the University
Auditorium. R-410 (A) is a zeotropic and its ODP is zero due to the absence of chlorine. Although it has a higher GWP
than R-22 due to its higher SEER rating, and by reducing the power consumption of the system, it is overall more