Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay
Este es un artículo de acceso abierto distribuido bajo los términos de una licencia de uso y distribución CC BY-NC 4.0. Para ver
una copia de esta licencia visite http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 193
Application of Six Sigma Methodology for Enhancement of Soft Plastic
Extrusion Process
Aplicación de la metodología Seis Sigma para la mejora del proceso de extrusión
de plásticos blandos
Aplicação da Metodologia Seis Sigma para Aprimoramento do Processo de
Extrusão de Plástico Macio
Muhammad Mansoor Uz Zaman Siddiqui
1
(*), Adeel Tabassum
2
Recibido: 12/11/2024 Aceptado: 28/01/2025
Summary. - The gasket manufacturing process in “Company A faced significant challenges and inefficiencies
because of high rejection rates and variation in extrusion machine, magnetic insertion machine and welding machine’s
performance. All three machines were consistently generating major rejections on a daily basis including a high volume
of purging rejections from the PVC soft extrusion machine, excessive trimming of oversized magnets during the
magnetic insertion process, and significant rejection due to poor joint strength in the welding process of PVC profiles.
In order to address these underlying issues, Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control)
methodology was employed in order to decrease rejection/waste, increase process efficiency and decrease defects of
all three machines. The study involved process mapping, cause and effect analysis, quality function deployment (QFD)
and statistical process tools such as ANOVA, regression and Cp/Cpk analysis. Root causes were identified and targeted
improvements based on the data were introduced including optimized production planning, machine parameter
optimization and standardization, improvement of production execution planning and storage availability, temperature
controls on welding machines and encoder wheel knurling for magnetic insertion machine. The main objectives were
to deal with problems including material waste, variance in magnetic strip size, issues in welding machines and
frequent machine stoppages caused by improper production scheduling because of improper availability of storage
space for batch production independent of door pre-assembly plan. Following implementation, results show a
considerable decrease in extrusion machine rejection %age from 12% to 4.06%, a reduction in purging waste from 17
kg/day to 6.9 kg/day and an increase in machine efficiency from 50.1% to 83.3%. Furthermore, welding machine
rejection %age fell from 7% to 3.7% as a result of enhanced temperature management and equipment maintenance.
Size variation issue in magnet insertion machine was resolved by knurling of encoder wheel. Overall, these changes
resulted in an annual cost savings of roughly 1.5 million PKR for the extrusion process and 1.2 million from magnet
insertion machine. The significance of this project originates from its potential to streamline the gasket production
process by reducing waste and faults while increasing machine efficiency. The results offer a replicable framework
that can be employed across wide range of manufacturing industries for quality improvement and cost optimization.
Keywords: Gasket manufacturing, DMAIC methodology, Six sigma, Process optimization, waste reduction,
sustainable production, ANOVA, Statistical process control.
Resumen. - El proceso de fabricación de juntas en la “Empresa A” se enfrentaba a importantes desafíos e ineficiencias
debido a las altas tasas de rechazo y a la variación en el rendimiento de las máquinas de extrusión, inserción
magnética y soldadura. Las tres máquinas generaban rechazos importantes a diario, incluyendo un alto volumen de
rechazos por purga de la máquina de extrusión blanda de PVC, un recorte excesivo de imanes de gran tamaño durante
el proceso de inserción magnética y un rechazo significativo debido a la baja resistencia de las uniones en el proceso
de soldadura de los perfiles de PVC. Para abordar estos problemas subyacentes, se empleó la metodología Six Sigma
DMAIC (Definir, Medir, Analizar, Mejorar, Controlar) con el fin de reducir el rechazo/desperdicio, aumentar la
(*) Corresponding author.
1
Master of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, NEDUET (Pakistan), 2023phdmnf1@student.uet.edu.pk,
ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8992-7601
2
Mechanical Engineer, Department of Mechanical Engineering, NUST (Pakistan), adeeltabassum1@gmail.com,
ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9375-1090
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 194
eficiencia del proceso y disminuir los defectos en las tres máquinas. El estudio incluyó el mapeo de procesos, el análisis
de causa y efecto, el despliegue de la función de calidad (QFD) y herramientas estadísticas de proceso como ANOVA,
regresión y análisis Cp/Cpk. Se identificaron las causas raíz y se introdujeron mejoras específicas basadas en los
datos, incluyendo la planificación optimizada de la producción, la optimización y estandarización de los parámetros
de la máquina, la mejora de la planificación de la ejecución de la producción y la disponibilidad de almacenamiento,
los controles de temperatura en las quinas de soldar y el moleteado de la rueda del codificador para la máquina
de inserción magnética. Los principales objetivos fueron abordar problemas como el desperdicio de material, la
variación en el tamaño de la banda magnética, los problemas en las máquinas de soldar y las frecuentes paradas de
la máquina causadas por una programación de producción incorrecta debido a la disponibilidad inadecuada de
espacio de almacenamiento para la producción por lotes independientemente del plan de premontaje de la puerta.
Después de la implementación, los resultados muestran una disminución considerable en el porcentaje de rechazo de
la máquina de extrusión del 12% al 4,06%, una reducción en el desperdicio de purga de 17 kg/día a 6,9 kg/día y un
aumento en la eficiencia de la máquina del 50,1% al 83,3%. Además, el porcentaje de rechazo de la quina de soldar
disminuyó del 7% al 3,7% como resultado de una mejor gestión de la temperatura y el mantenimiento del equipo. El
problema de variación de tamaño en la máquina de inserción de imanes se resolvió mediante el moleteado de la rueda
del codificador. En general, estos cambios resultaron en un ahorro anual de aproximadamente 1,5 millones de rupias
pakistaníes (PKR) en el proceso de extrusión y 1,2 millones en la máquina de inserción de imanes. La importancia de
este proyecto radica en su potencial para optimizar el proceso de producción de juntas, reduciendo el desperdicio y
los fallos, a la vez que aumenta la eficiencia de la quina. Los resultados ofrecen un marco replicable que puede
emplearse en una amplia gama de industrias manufactureras para mejorar la calidad y optimizar los costes.
Palabras clave: Fabricación de juntas, metodología DMAIC, Six sigma, Optimización de procesos, reducción de
desperdicios, producción sustentable, ANOVA, Control estadístico de procesos.
Resumo. - O processo de fabricação de juntas na "Empresa A" enfrentou desafios e ineficiências significativos devido
às altas taxas de rejeição e à variação no desempenho da máquina de extrusão, da máquina de inserção magnética e
da máquina de solda. Todas as três máquinas geravam consistentemente grandes rejeições diariamente, incluindo um
alto volume de rejeições por purga da quina de extrusão de PVC macio, corte excessivo de ímãs
superdimensionados durante o processo de inserção magnética e rejeição significativa devido à baixa resistência da
junta no processo de soldagem de perfis de PVC. Para abordar essas questões subjacentes, a metodologia Six Sigma
DMAIC (Definir, Medir, Analisar, Melhorar, Controlar) foi empregada para diminuir a rejeição/desperdício,
aumentar a eficiência do processo e diminuir os defeitos das três máquinas. O estudo envolveu mapeamento de
processos, análise de causa e efeito, implantação da função de qualidade (QFD) e ferramentas estatísticas de
processo, como ANOVA, regressão e análise Cp/Cpk. As causas-raiz foram identificadas e melhorias direcionadas
com base nos dados foram introduzidas, incluindo planejamento de produção otimizado, otimização e padronização
dos parâmetros da máquina, melhoria do planejamento da execução da produção e disponibilidade de
armazenamento, controles de temperatura em máquinas de solda e recartilhamento da roda do encoder para máquina
de inserção magnética. Os principais objetivos eram lidar com problemas incluindo desperdício de material, variação
no tamanho da tira magnética, problemas em máquinas de solda e paradas frequentes de máquinas causadas por
programação de produção inadequada devido à disponibilidade inadequada de espaço de armazenamento para
produção em lote independente do plano de pré-montagem da porta. Após a implementação, os resultados mostram
uma redução considerável na porcentagem de rejeição da máquina de extrusão de 12% para 4,06%, uma redução no
desperdício de purga de 17 kg/dia para 6,9 kg/dia e um aumento na eficiência da máquina de 50,1% para 83,3%.
Além disso, a porcentagem de rejeição da máquina de solda caiu de 7% para 3,7% como resultado do gerenciamento
aprimorado de temperatura e manutenção do equipamento. O problema de variação de tamanho na máquina de
inserção magnética foi resolvido pelo recartilhamento da roda do codificador. No geral, essas mudanças resultaram
em uma economia de custos anual de aproximadamente 1,5 milhão de PKR para o processo de extrusão e 1,2 milhão
da máquina de inserção magnética. A importância deste projeto se origina de seu potencial para agilizar o processo
de produção de juntas, reduzindo desperdícios e falhas, enquanto aumenta a eficiência da máquina. Os resultados
oferecem uma estrutura replicável que pode ser empregada em uma ampla gama de indústrias de manufatura para
melhoria de qualidade e otimização de custos.
Palavras-chave: Fabricação de juntas, metodologia DMAIC, Seis sigma, otimização de processos, redução de
desperdícios, produção sustentável, ANOVA, controle estatístico de processos.
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 195
1. Introduction. - The manufacturing sector constantly strives to minimize rejection and rework during production
while simultaneously enhancing production efficiency and product quality (A Paramasivam, 2022). Six sigma
methodology (Tjahjono, 2010) (Hill, 2017) (S. Reosekar) (Patel, 2021) in its essence was first introduced in 1986 by
Bill smith and Mikel harry, the two engineers from Motorola in 1986. The term "Six Sigma" originates from a statistical
concept that describes a process with no more than 3.4 defects per million opportunities (Noori, 2018). Six sigma
methodology (Macias-Aguayo, Garcia-Castro, Barcia, McFarlane, & Abad-Moran, 2022) as evident from its name is
a six step-based data driven approach which aim to reduce the defects and variability in manufacturing process by
using statistical tools and techniques (Yang C-C, 2022). It is a systematic approach and since its implementation by
companies across various manufacturing fields, has shown that it is enhances the production process efficiency by
reduction in defects and optimization of manufacturing process and as a result of this it increases customer (internal
and external) satisfaction (McDermott, et al., 2022). Companies have been able to save huge amount of money by
reduction in defects in products and increase in efficiency of production process (Alarcón, Calero, Pérez-Huertas, &
Martín-Lara, 2023) (Ndrecaj, Mohamed Hashim, Mason-Jones, Ndou, & Tlemsani, 2023). The most common six
sigma methodology that is being used in manufacturing sector is DMAIC and it stands for define, measure, analyze,
improve and control (Monika Smętkowska B. M., 2018). It is a closed loop process in which impact of improvement
measures is evaluated and improved until the desired results are obtained. After achieving the desired results final
phase is control which is of utmost importance as continuous improvement is only possible if is sustainable over longer
durations. This DMAIC approach is applicable in broad range of industries including manufacturing, software, sales,
quality, service and marketing (LM, 2022).
Gaskets that are produced through extrusion process are very critical part of refrigerator product as they provide sealing
of freezer and refrigerator compartments from the atmosphere thus keeping the cooling inside the refrigerator. The
profile is made up of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) (Lewandowski & Skórczewska, 2022) material and it contains a magnet
that is inserted into the profile before the joining process at the welding station. The magnet ensures the door remains
securely locked and airtight due to its strong attraction to the paint-coated material (PCM) side panel. If any issues
arise with the magnet, such as being too short, broken, or wavy, or if the profile welding joint opens due to
transportation or poor welding, hot air can enter the freezer or refrigerator compartment. This results in poor insulation
from the surrounding atmosphere. Quality of the gasket has direct impact on energy efficiency, compressor life,
refrigerator’s performance and preservation of food.
1.1 Problem statement. - Refrigerator gasket manufacturing process in the company A (for confidentiality reason)
has been facing lots of challenges regarding rejection and rework issues during extrusion process for gasket profile
manufacturing from PVC material, size variation issue during magnet cutting and magnet insertion station and poor
PVC weld joints issue. These issues not only increase process waste at the gasket manufacturing station, leading to
significant costs for Company A, but also negatively impact the efficiency of the gasket manufacturing process.
1.2 Objectives. - Objectives of implementation of six sigma methodology on gasket extrusion process are as under:
1- Improve efficiency and productivity of the extrusion process of gasket profile manufacturing process
2- Reduction in rejection and rework of gaskets
3- Enhance the quality and consistency of the gasket profiles
4- Cost savings by waste minimization
5- Reduction in magnet wastage because of size variation issue
6- Reduction in rejection and rework at welding machine station
2. Literature review. - In recent years, global economic landscape is going through one of the toughest times because
of rising material costs, fluctuation in demand, more competition from emerging markets (Most. Asikha Aktar, 2021).
These issues lead to increase in manufacturing cost and reduction in profit margins as product prices can only be
increased up to a certain because purchasing power of general public is also going down (Bailey, 2016). So, in order
to make the business sustainable, increase profit margins and bring the cost of manufacturing down, more and more
companies from different fields are employing six sigma methodologies in their manufacturing setup (Muraliraj). Six
sigma offers a systematic, data driven framework that helps companies identify inefficiencies, rejection and rework
reasons, things impacting the quality of the product thereby enabling the company to take corrective measures to
resolve these issues leading to increase in cost savings and profit margins even in uncertain economic environment.
The application of Six Sigma has produced notable non-financial and financial benefits/results for numerous Fortune
500 firms (Wasage, 2016). Allied Signal, General Electric, Raytheon, Bank of America, Bechtel, Caterpillar and
Motorola are a few of these businesses. By applying the six-sigma methodology, these businesses have drastically
decreased their defect rates and multiplied their profits by many folds (T. Costa F. S., 2017). Numerous studies have
demonstrated the importance of Six Sigma and Lean techniques in driving quality improvements and minimizing
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 196
process variability. Smętkowska and Mrugalska (2018) successfully applied Six Sigma DMAIC to reduce rejection
rates in manufacturing operations (Monika Smętkowska B. M., 2018). Similarly, Macias-Aguayo et al. (2022) stressed
the use of Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 principles to improve operational efficiency (Jaime Macias-Aguayo, 2022).
T. Costa et al. (2017) used Six Sigma to optimize extrusion processes in tire manufacture, resulting in considerable
defect reduction, demonstrating the applicability of this methodology to extrusion-based industries such as gasket
production (T. Costa F. S., 2017). Furthermore, Hassan Araman et al. (2023) shed light on six sigma and gasket
materials’ performance, emphasizing the need of exact dimensional control and structural integrity in preserving
refrigerator insulation and energy efficiency (Araman, 2023).
This literature clearly establishes the applicability of Six Sigma in gasket extrusion processes, specifically for
identifying root causes of quality issues, improving dimensional accuracy and ensuring overall product integrity and
process stability. Six sigma methodologies can be applied across any manufacturing industry. Building upon these
insights, the current study applies Six Sigma principles to a real-time manufacturing process of soft plastic gaskets,
aiming for practical process enhancements and measurable outcomes.
There are several other key philosophies in the manufacturing industry, such as Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma.
Six Sigma is a data-driven methodology that utilizes statistical tools to minimize defects and reduce process variability.
Whereas Lean Manufacturing primarily focuses on eliminating waste and improving process flow. Lean practices
typically target Ohno’s seven types of waste to enhance production efficiency. Six sigma uses DMAIC methodology
in which multiple statistical tools are used during different phases in order to achieve the desired result. All those tools
will be discussed in the methodology section in detail. Six Sigma is a statistical term that represents a process in which
minimal defects occur. “Sigma" (σ) stands for a process's standard deviation in Six Sigma terminology. A process that
achieves a Six Sigma level is said to produce less than 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO), which is an
indication of almost perfect quality. This yield %age is equal to 99.9997% error-free output (Raman Sharma, 2018).
Sigma Level
DPMO
Yield
6
3.4
99.9997%
5.5
32
99.9987%
5
233
99.9770%
4.5
1350
99.8700%
4
6210
99.3800%
3.5
22750
97.7000%
3
66807
93.3000%
2.5
158655
84.1000%
2
308538
69.1000%
1.5
500005
50.0000%
1
691462
30.9000%
0.5
841345
15.9000%
Table 1 Sigma level and comparative values of DPMO and Yield %age
Values in Table 1 represents that as sigma level increases defects per million opportunities decreases and yield %age
(defect free units) increases. This means that if 1 million parts are produced, the DPMO (defects per million
opportunities) represents the number of defective parts out of those 1 million. The yield percentage indicates the %age
of the parts produced without any defects.
Figure I. Normal distribution curve or Bell curve
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 197
The X-bar line in Figure represents that normal data is distributed symmetrically around mean. A normal curve is
useful for determining the probability that a given data point in a population will fall within a certain range of the
distribution (Amaral, 2022).
The X-bar line in Figure represents the mean and normal data is formed symmetrically around it. A normal curve is
useful for determining the chance that a given data point in a population will fall within a certain range of the
distribution. Red arrow covers ±1σ from mean and = standard deviation) represents that 68.26% of all data points
falls within this range. Blue arrow covers ±2σ from mean and it represents that 95.46% of all data points falls within
this range. The purple arrow covers ±3σ from mean and it represents that 99.7% of data points fall in this range. In a
perfect bell curve mean median and mode of the data set are same and located at the peak of the curve. The ends of
normal distribution curve are known as tails, and these represents extreme values in a data set. In six sigma defects
normally fall in these tails. Six sigma practitioners can determine the process capability (Cp & Cpk) which shows how
well the process is performing relative to specification limits.
Gasket is an integral part of refrigerator product (Guoqiang Liu, A review of refrigerator gasket: Development trend,
heat and mass transfer characteristics, structure and material optimization, 2021) which help keep the refrigerator
freezer and refrigerator compartment insulated from environment. Gasket profile is manufactured from the polyvinyl
chloride (PVC) material through the extrusion process. Extrusion process is a manufacturing technique in which a
material is heated according to the required specifications in a barrel which is then forced through a die to achieve the
required profile (Guoqiang Liu, Research on test method of heat transfer coefficient for refrigerator gasket, 2020).
After exiting of PVC profile from die it is shifted to cooling station through conveyors where it is cooled down through
water jets. These profiles are then shifted to cutting station where they are cut to desired length as per requirement.
These profiles are then later on moved to stock area and then as per requirement to magnet insertion machine area
where magnets are inserted into the profile as per the required length. After this step all these profiles are moved from
magnet insertion machine to welding area where these profiles are inserted into the die, joined by heating them up to
required temperature and then die is closed resulting in a joint formation. All these processes are very critical with
many potential modes of failures which will be discussed in later part of the paper (Tianyang Zhao, 2024).
2.1 Research gap. - The revenue generated by refrigerator manufacturing industry worldwide is estimated to 121
billion USD. Being a billion-dollar industry, no research has been conducted on combined optimization of extrusion,
magnet insertion and welding process. In this project six sigma methodology will be systematically applied in order to
identify the key problems in the whole gasket manufacturing process. These defects/problems will then be later
addressed by using six sigma DMAIC methodology.
2.2 Significance of the study. - Implementing Six Sigma in optimizing the gasket manufacturing process is highly
significant, especially in the context of current economic challenges where high manufacturing costs and price
increases are unsustainable. This optimization will enhance process efficiency, reduce rejections & rework thus
lowering the overall manufacturing cost of the gaskets. Additionally, it will lead to a reduction in defects, both
internally and at the customer end. Furthermore, this project will set a benchmark for the refrigerator manufacturing
industry, demonstrating the value of applying Six Sigma methodology not only in gasket production but potentially
across all manufacturing processes.
3. Methodology. - In order to carry out this research work, six sigma DMAIC methodology was adopted. DMAIC is
a systematic problem-based and customer centric data/target-oriented approach consisting of five basic steps. Those
steps/phases are defined phase, measure phase, analyze phase, improve phase and control phase. Define was started
by making a project charter in which objective of the project, goals, deliverables and problem statement were defined.
Whole gasket extrusion manufacturing process was mapped by using SIPOC diagram (Supplier, Inputs, Process,
Outputs, Customer). VOC (voice of customer) vs VOB (voice of business) analysis was done in order to list down the
common requirements of customer (internal) and business. FMEA (Failure mode effect analysis) was conducted to
identify initial potential failures, evaluate and prioritize risks and suggesting potential solutions/action plan for
prevention of those failures in gasket extrusion manufacturing process. Re FMEA will be done at a later stage again in
order to evaluate the performance of the project. In second measure phase, data of extrusion machine production,
magnetic strip rejection/scrap and welding machines rejection and rework was gathered in order to measure the current
process performance and set the baseline for improvements in coming phase. In the third phase i.e., the analysis phase,
analysis of top problems was conducted and for this purpose detailed cause and effect diagram were made, and top
five problems were prioritized by performing pareto analysis. Quality function deployment (QFD) tool was used to
prioritize customer requirements and to their relationship with functional requirement for better finished product.
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 198
3.1 Define Phase. - Define phase is one of the first steps in DMAIC methodology. This phase focused on gathering
insights from various stakeholders specifically customer, process owner (production team). This helped in identifying
critical issues in the gasket manufacturing area. First step in define phase to make a project charter in which objectives,
goals, project deliverables, in-scope, out-scope and problem statement were defined.
3.2 Problem Statement. - In the Year 2023, 27,283 gaskets rejected out of 2,84,477 gaskets produced at Gasket
Manufacturing Area. Out of these 27,283 rejected gaskets, 7267 gaskets were crushed, and 20,016 gaskets were
scrapped. The rejection ratio stands at 9.57% and by 15 kg of average value of purging waste for 287 days, this costed
company 3.5 million rupees. As 1.95” magnetic strips get rejected per each profile leading to further cost of 0.96
million rupees. If these issues persist, this could result in a potential loss of 4.5 million rupees to the company in 2024.
Now in order to assist planning and keep the track of project during its various phases, a Gantt chart was setup with
deadlines of the project phase wise. Gantt chart is available in Figure .
Figure II. Gantt chart with project milestones and deadlines.
Understanding the voice of customer and voice of business was absolutely necessary in order to identify the most
important things related to gasket manufacturing process from customer and management point of view. VOB vs VOC
was prepared, and intersection points were considered as goals of the projects. VOB vs VOC is shown in Figure .
Figure III. Voice of business (VOB) vs Voice of Customer (VOC).
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 199
In this comparison of VOB (Voice of the Business) and VOC (Voice of the Customer), common goals were identified
that were important to both the immediate customer, the door assembly line and management. Key objectives included
cost savings, improving production efficiency, optimizing machine energy consumption, controlling waste,
minimizing defects passed to the customer and reducing variations in the sizes of PVC profiles and magnetic strips.
After that a SIPOC (supplier-input-process-output-customer) was plotted in order to identify all the suppliers (internal
and external), inputs, process mapping, outputs and customer (internal). SIPOC is used to understand the process
components and relevance as it is a simple tool. This was developed through brainstorming session with the project
team and process owner (production team). SIPOC diagram is available in Figure .
Figure IV. SIPOC of gasket manufacturing process.
In the SIPOC, the process was clearly outlined, with both internal and external suppliers and all process inputs
identified. The outcomes, including the finished product and scrap, were also defined, along with the customer, Door
Pre-Assembly. This tool enables a comprehensive understanding of all aspects related to the process and helps in
identifying critical elements. It provides a foundation for process improvement and acts as a starting point for more
detailed analysis in the later stages of the DMAIC methodology.
Visually representing each stage of the gasket manufacturing process, from the input of raw materials to the output of
the finished product, is known as process mapping. This involves mapping the extrusion of PVC profiles to inserting
magnetic strips in PVC profiles and then welding of these gasket profiles. This process map makes it easy to see how
steps in manufacturing link to one another. Now in order to get the clear representation of the workflow and for
identification of bottlenecks and inefficiencies, process map was developed and can be seen in Figure .
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 200
Figure V. Process map of gasket manufacturing process.
3.3 Measure Phase. - Measuring the process's current performance is the main goal of the DMAIC Measure phase.
Data is gathered during this phase to measure important metrics about rejection, cycle time, production rates and other
important parameters, as well as to provide a baseline for the process. Data was collected from quality inspection
reports, production monitoring reports, operator check sheets and from machine logs. In order to ensure the integrity
of the analysis and remove any biases in the data, several statistical tools were employed. These tools will be discussed
in detail in later section of ANOVA. Prior to making any modifications, it is important to know how the process is
working in order to enable more accurate analysis in later phases. In the measure phase, data of gasket manufacturing
process was gathered in order to set the baseline of the gasket manufacturing process and identify all the issues and
inefficiencies by analyzing the data gathered through check sheets. Gasket manufacturing process was divided into
three processes; extrusion of soft PVC (polyvinyl chloride) material in order to make gasket profiles, magnet insertion
station and welding station of PVC profiles. For all these three processes, data on machine actual production, rejection
reasons, loss time in hours, machine efficiency and parameters monitoring were collected. Extrusion machine
efficiency monitoring report is available in Table
Sr. No
Date
Standard
Working time
Total Actual
Production
(kg)
Efficiency
1
10th July, 2024
11
51
10%
2
12th July, 2024
16
341
47%
3
13th July, 2024
19
348
41%
4
15th July, 2024
16
416
58%
5
16th July, 2024
22
487
49%
6
19th July, 2024
19
402
47%
7
20th July, 2024
19
477
56%
8
21st July, 2024
19
516
60%
9
22nd July, 2024
19
436
51%
10
23rd July, 2024
19
298
35%
11
24th July, 2024
19
454
53%
12
26th July, 2024
19
434
51%
13
27th July, 2024
22
471
48%
Start Raw material
addition in
hopper
Heating of
material
Extrusion
(Material passing
through die to attain
the required shape)
Water jets for
cooling of PVC
profile
Punching of
holes in gaskets
for air
Cutting of
gasket profiles
PVC profile
stock area
Magnetic strip
insertion
machine
Welding
machines for
joining PVC
profiles
Over size
Magnetic strip
manual cutting
Inspection of
gaskets
Inspection of
PVC profiles
Stock area/hangers
Ok
Not
ok
Crusher
Ok
Not
ok
Magnet
recovery area
Manual
insertion of
magnetic strip
into PVC
profiles
End
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 201
14
28th July, 2024
16
350
49%
15
29th July, 2024
19
340
40%
16
30th July, 2024
19
390
46%
17
31st July, 2024
16
415
58%
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
550
56%
19
2nd Aug, 2024
16
570
79%
20
3rd Aug, 2024
16
520
72%
21
4th Aug, 2024
16
400
56%
22
5th Aug, 2024
19
391
46%
23
6th Aug, 2024
19
371
43%
24
7th Aug, 2024
19
250
29%
25
8th Aug, 2024
19
378
44%
26
9th Aug, 2024
16
421
58%
27
10th Aug, 2024
16
413
57%
28
11th Aug, 2024
16
401
56%
29
12th Aug, 2024
16
397
55%
30
13th Aug, 2024
16
386
54%
Table II. Extrusion machine efficiency monitoring report.
Extrusion machine rejection data is mentioned in the Table .
Sr. No
Date
Standard
Working
time
(hours)
Total
Standard
Production
(kg)
Total Actual
Production
(kg)
Rejection
%age
Total
Rejection
(kg)
1
10th July, 2024
11
495
51
88%
45
2
12th July, 2024
16
720
341
12%
40
3
13th July, 2024
19
855
348
13%
44
4
15th July, 2024
16
720
416
12%
48
5
16th July, 2024
22
990
487
12%
57
6
19th July, 2024
19
855
402
9%
37
7
20th July, 2024
19
855
477
6%
30
8
21st July, 2024
19
855
516
11%
58
9
22nd July, 2024
19
855
436
12%
52
10
23rd July, 2024
19
855
298
18%
54
11
24th July, 2024
19
855
454
12%
54
12
26th July, 2024
19
855
434
6%
27
13
27th July, 2024
22
990
471
9%
42
14
28th July, 2024
16
720
350
13%
45
15
29th July, 2024
19
855
340
12%
41
16
30th July, 2024
19
855
390
11%
43
17
31st July, 2024
16
720
415
12%
49
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
990
550
7%
38
19
2nd Aug, 2024
16
720
570
12%
70
20
3rd Aug, 2024
16
720
520
15%
78
21
4th Aug, 2024
16
720
400
14%
54
22
5th Aug, 2024
19
855
391
9%
35
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 202
23
6th Aug, 2024
19
855
371
12%
46
24
7th Aug, 2024
19
855
250
16%
41
25
8th Aug, 2024
19
855
378
11%
42
26
9th Aug, 2024
16
720
421
11%
45
27
10th Aug, 2024
16
720
413
8%
35
28
11th Aug, 2024
16
720
401
10%
39
29
12th Aug, 2024
16
720
397
13%
53
30
13th Aug, 2024
16
720
386
15%
56
Grand Total
12076
11.6%
1398
Table III. Extrusion machine rejection data
Welding machines efficiency monitoring report is mentioned in the Table .
Sr.
No
Date
Standard
Working hours
(hrs.)
Total No.
of
Machines
Total
UPH
Actual
Production
Standard
Production
Efficiency
1
10th July, 2024
11
5
200
1255
2200
57%
2
12th July, 2024
11
5
200
970
2200
44%
3
13th July, 2024
22
10
400
1610
4400
37%
4
15th July, 2024
22
8
320
1848
3520
53%
5
16th July, 2024
8
4
160
1004
1280
78%
6
19th July, 2024
22
8
320
2053
3520
58%
7
20th July, 2024
19
9
360
2485
3360
74%
8
21st July, 2024
22
8
320
2270
3520
64%
9
22nd July, 2024
11
3
120
1046
1320
79%
10
23rd July, 2024
22
7
280
2085
3080
68%
11
24th July, 2024
22
7
280
1764
3080
57%
12
26th July, 2024
22
7
280
2078
3080
67%
13
27th July, 2024
22
7
280
1626
3080
53%
14
28th July, 2024
19
7
280
1416
2720
52%
15
29th July, 2024
22
7
280
1676
3080
54%
16
30th July, 2024
11
4
160
1004
1760
57%
17
31st July, 2024
22
7
280
2376
3080
77%
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
6
240
1790
2640
68%
19
2nd Aug, 2024
11
4
160
1108
1760
63%
20
3rd Aug, 2024
11
4
160
986
1760
56%
21
4th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
1120
1760
64%
22
5th Aug, 2024
11
5
200
385
2200
18%
23
6th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
419
1760
24%
24
7th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
944
1760
54%
25
8th Aug, 2024
11
5
200
1222
2200
56%
26
9th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
328
1760
19%
27
10th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
525
1760
30%
28
11th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
929
1760
53%
29
12th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
885
1760
50%
30
13th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
508
1760
29%
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 203
Table
Sr.
No
Date
Standard
Working hours
(hrs.)
Total No.
of
Machines
Total
UPH
Actual
Production
Standard
Production
Efficiency
1
10th July, 2024
11
5
200
1255
2200
57%
2
12th July, 2024
11
5
200
970
2200
44%
3
13th July, 2024
22
10
400
1610
4400
37%
4
15th July, 2024
22
8
320
1848
3520
53%
5
16th July, 2024
8
4
160
1004
1280
78%
6
19th July, 2024
22
8
320
2053
3520
58%
7
20th July, 2024
19
9
360
2485
3360
74%
8
21st July, 2024
22
8
320
2270
3520
64%
9
22nd July, 2024
11
3
120
1046
1320
79%
10
23rd July, 2024
22
7
280
2085
3080
68%
11
24th July, 2024
22
7
280
1764
3080
57%
12
26th July, 2024
22
7
280
2078
3080
67%
13
27th July, 2024
22
7
280
1626
3080
53%
14
28th July, 2024
19
7
280
1416
2720
52%
15
29th July, 2024
22
7
280
1676
3080
54%
16
30th July, 2024
11
4
160
1004
1760
57%
17
31st July, 2024
22
7
280
2376
3080
77%
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
6
240
1790
2640
68%
19
2nd Aug, 2024
11
4
160
1108
1760
63%
20
3rd Aug, 2024
11
4
160
986
1760
56%
21
4th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
1120
1760
64%
22
5th Aug, 2024
11
5
200
385
2200
18%
23
6th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
419
1760
24%
24
7th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
944
1760
54%
25
8th Aug, 2024
11
5
200
1222
2200
56%
26
9th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
328
1760
19%
27
10th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
525
1760
30%
28
11th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
929
1760
53%
29
12th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
885
1760
50%
30
13th Aug, 2024
11
4
160
508
1760
29%
Table IV. Welding machine efficiency monitoring report.
Welding machines rejection data is attached in Table .
Sr. No
Date
Standard
Working
hours
(hours)
Actual
Production
(Nos)
Standard
Production
(Nos)
Rejection
Quantity
Rejection
%age
1
10th July, 2024
11
1255
2200
90
7%
2
12th July, 2024
11
970
2200
80
8%
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 204
3
13th July, 2024
22
1610
4400
70
4%
4
15th July, 2024
22
1848
3520
85
5%
5
16th July, 2024
8
1004
1280
101
10%
6
19th July, 2024
22
2053
3520
109
5%
7
20th July, 2024
19
2485
3360
105
4%
8
21st July, 2024
22
2270
3520
95
4%
9
22nd July, 2024
11
1046
1320
87
8%
10
23rd July, 2024
22
2085
3080
115
6%
11
24th July, 2024
22
1764
3080
111
6%
12
26th July, 2024
22
2078
3080
102
5%
13
27th July, 2024
22
1626
3080
104
6%
14
28th July, 2024
19
1416
2720
110
8%
15
29th July, 2024
22
1676
3080
95
6%
16
30th July, 2024
11
1004
1760
90
9%
17
31st July, 2024
22
2376
3080
89
4%
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
1790
2640
112
6%
19
2nd Aug, 2024
11
1108
1760
120
11%
20
3rd Aug, 2024
11
986
1760
131
13%
21
4th Aug, 2024
11
1120
1760
87
8%
22
5th Aug, 2024
11
385
2200
55
14%
23
6th Aug, 2024
11
419
1760
41
10%
24
7th Aug, 2024
11
944
1760
31
3%
25
8th Aug, 2024
11
1222
2200
59
5%
26
9th Aug, 2024
11
328
1760
67
20%
27
10th Aug, 2024
11
525
1760
61
12%
28
11th Aug, 2024
11
929
1760
80
9%
29
12th Aug, 2024
11
885
1760
71
8%
30
13th Aug, 2024
11
508
1760
51
10%
Table V. Welding m/c's rejection data.
Magnet that is inserted into PVC profile before welding is one of the most critical stations as far as oversized magnet
strip rejection per profile is concerned. Its data is gathered and is present in the Table .
Sr.
No
Date
Standard
Working
hours
(hours)
Actual
Production
(Nos)
Rejection
per profile
(m)
Rejection
per gasket
(m)
Total
rejection
of magnet
per day
(m)
Total
rejection
magnet
per day
(kg)
1
10th July, 2024
11
1255
0.044
0.176
221
13
2
12th July, 2024
11
970
0.044
0.176
171
10
3
13th July, 2024
22
1610
0.044
0.176
283
17
4
15th July, 2024
22
1848
0.044
0.176
325
20
5
16th July, 2024
8
1004
0.044
0.176
177
11
6
19th July, 2024
22
2053
0.044
0.176
361
22
7
20th July, 2024
19
2485
0.044
0.176
437
26
8
21st July, 2024
22
2270
0.044
0.176
400
24
9
22nd July, 2024
11
1046
0.044
0.176
184
11
10
23rd July, 2024
22
2085
0.044
0.176
367
22
M. M. Uz Zaman Siddiqui, A. Tabassum
Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, núm. 28 (2025). pp. 193-221
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14
ISSN 2301-1092 ISSN (en línea) 2301-1106 Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay 205
11
24th July, 2024
22
1764
0.044
0.176
310
19
12
26th July, 2024
22
2078
0.044
0.176
366
22
13
27th July, 2024
22
1626
0.044
0.176
286
17
14
28th July, 2024
19
1416
0.044
0.176
249
15
15
29th July, 2024
22
1676
0.044
0.176
295
18
16
30th July, 2024
11
1004
0.044
0.176
177
11
17
31st July, 2024
22
2376
0.044
0.176
418
25
18
1st Aug, 2024
22
1790
0.044
0.176
315
19
19
2nd Aug, 2024
11
1108
0.044
0.176
195
12
20
3rd Aug, 2024
11
986
0.044
0.176
174
10
21
4th Aug, 2024
11
1120
0.044
0.176
197
12
22
5th Aug, 2024
11
385
0.044
0.176
68
4
23
6th Aug, 2024
11
419
0.044
0.176
74
4
24
7th Aug, 2024
11
944
0.044
0.176
166
10
25
8th Aug, 2024
11
1222
0.044
0.176
215
13
26
9th Aug, 2024
11
328
0.044
0.176
58
3
27
10th Aug, 2024
11
525
0.044
0.176
92
6
28
11th Aug, 2024
11
929
0.044
0.176
164
10
29
12th Aug, 2024
11
885
0.044
0.176
156
9
30
13th Aug, 2024
11
508
0.044
0.176
89
5
*Every gasket has 4 profiles
*1-meter magnet = 60 gm
Table VI. Magnet insertion machine data
3.4 Analyze Phase. - FMEA (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) is a tool used in the Six Sigma methodology to
identify probable failure modes in the production process and evaluate their impact on product quality. FMEA helps
in the identification of potential flaws such as size variances, joining problems or material issues by examining crucial
steps including PVC extrusion, magnetic strip insertion and welding of gasket profiles. For this gasket manufacturing
process, a detailed FMEA was developed in which teams prioritized process improvements by using the risk priority
number (RPN) that was assigned on factors including severity, occurrence and detection. This is in line with Six
Sigma's objective of reducing variances and improving quality by ensuring defect reduction, process optimization and
overall product reliability. FMEA is available in Figure