La determinación del daño en patentes. El lucro cesante, la regalía razonable, el enriquecimiento injusto y la restitución de los frutos
Keywords:
Damages, Patens, REasonable royalty, Unjust enrichment, Restitution of fruitsAbstract
The determination of damages caused due to the violation of an intellectual property right implies an arduous task for the interpreters of the law. In the present work, we analyze the different positions that scholars have held in this respect for analogous institutes such as trademarks, their legal basis and the differences that each one of them imply in practical terms when determining compensation. Sustained positions have been the following: payment of a reasonable royalty based on loss of profits (damages) or the doctrine of unjust enrichment (article 1308 of the civil code) and / or the restitution of proceeds (articles 694 and 695 of the civil code). The position taken will have consequences not only on the determination of the quantum of compensation but also on the application term, especially as from the reform of article 99 of law Nº17164 of the year 2013 regarding the commencement of the term as from which damages caused should be compensated.
Downloads
References
Berdaguer, Jaime, “Cuasicontratos”, FCU, Montevideo, 2009, p. 103 y 104.
Blengio, Juan E. . “El Principio de Reparación Integral del Daño. Doctrina y Jurisprudencia de Derecho Civil. Tomo IV. 2016 p. 33
Caffera, Gerardo y Mendive, Andrés: “La restitución del enriquecimiento ilícito en el Código Civil uruguayo”, en ADCU 2009, p. 862.
Carnelli, Santiago - Ramírez, Juan Andrés, “Responsabilidad por el hecho ilícito que enriquece al sujeto responsable”, en ADC nº 33, 2002 p. 588
Chijane, Diego . La defensa Judicial del Derecho de Marcas. 2017. P. 263.
Howard, Aparicio. “La restitución por enriquecimiento ilícito por infracción al derecho de marca. Revista CADE. Tomo XLVI. Año 10. Sección Profesionales y Empresas. Septiembre 2018. P. 77.
Larrañaga, Luis . “El Principio de Reparación Integral del Daño. Doctrina y jurisprudencia de Derecho Civil. Tomo IV. 2016 p. 137. Sentencia del Tribunal de Apelaciones de 6º turno (Martínez Rosso, Hounie, klett), nº 100025/2012