Comparative analysis between the displacement-based method (MBD) and the force-based method (MBF) applied to a dual 5-story building

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.27.3

Keywords:

Drifts, Dual system, Seismic design, Severe earthquake, Displacement, Forces

Abstract

This research is addressed with the purpose of establishing control of the effects of greater drifts in buildings by applying seismic guidelines methods in accordance with parameters of the NTP E0.30, as a design strategy under the approach of the method based on displacements. The structure as a sample is a common building with a dual 5-story system that is located in the city of Arequipa, Cerro Colorado district. To document each structural change in the project, it is supported by the use of structural analysis software such as ETABS. . Using force-based seismic design methods as a base foundation and subsequently being evaluated using displacement-based seismic design methods that demonstrated good design engineering practices. This study focuses on the implementation of the new approach using modern seismic design methods proposed by Priestley et al., 2007 to evaluate specific buildings and compare them with leading standards. This level of work is purely theoretical in nature, the investigation of the proposed seismic design methods is carried out through the seismic design standards, permissible in the Peruvian standard precisely in the RNE, the main objective of this study is to achieve the expected results of the behavior of the buildings underground accelerations, the possible damage to the structure in case of severe earthquakes or design earthquakes were determined, as well as for the different earthquake levels, the maximum displacements of the structure were verified, and The contrasting conditions of the proposed delineation methods were identified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguiar F, R. (2007). Factor de reducción de las fuerzas sísmicas en edificios de hormigon armado sin muros de corte. Barcelona: Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numèrics en Enginyeria (CIMNE). Obtenido de http://hdl.handle.net/2117/28502

American Society of Civil Engineers [ASCE]. (2014). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/9780784412855

Applied Technology Council [ATC]. (1996). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (ATC-40). Obtenido de http://tanbakoochi.com/File/www.tanbakoochi.com-ATC40.pdf

Applied Technology Council [ATC-55 Project]. (2005). Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures (FEMA 440). Obtenido de https://mitigation.eeri.org/wp-content/uploads/fema-440.pdf

Building Seismic Safety Council. (2006). NEHRP Recommended Provisions: For Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures and Accompanying Commentary and Maps (FEMA 451). Obtenido de https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/FEMA/PB2008108226.pdf

Ministerio de Vivienda, Construcción y Saneamiento [MVCS]. (2019). Reglamento Nacional de Edificaciones - R.N.E. (E 030 Diseño Sismo-resistente). Aprobado por RM-043-2019-Vivienda. (Perú). Obtenido de https://infocad3d.com/reglamento-nacional-de-edificaciones/

Niquen, K., Villarreal, G., & Niquen, V. (2023). Análisis comparativo del comportamiento estructural de una edificación de cuatro niveles con base fija y base aislada. Memoria Investigaciones en Ingeniería, 107-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.25.8

Priestley, M., Calvi, G., & Kowalsky, M. (2007). Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures. Pavia: IUSS Press. Obtenido de https://books.google.com.pe/books/about/Displacement_based_Seismic_Design_

Structural Engineers Association of California [SEAOC] VISION 2000 . (1995). Performance Based Seismic Engineering of Buildings. Obtenido de https://es.scribd.com/document/416420604/seaoc-vision-2000-pdf

Suárez, J. A. (2018). Análisis sísmico comparativo entre el método de diseño basado en fuerzas y el método de diseño directo basado en desplazamientos [Tesis de bachiller, Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí]. Obtenido de http://repositorio.unesum.edu.ec/handle/53000/1410

VISION 2000. (1995). Desempeño sísmico de edificios: binomio capacidad-demanda. Obtenido de https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/6230/04CAPITULO3.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

[1]
G. Zavala Cáceres and G. Villarreal Castro, “Comparative analysis between the displacement-based method (MBD) and the force-based method (MBF) applied to a dual 5-story building”, Memoria investig. ing. (Facultad Ing., Univ. Montev.), no. 27, pp. 3–45, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles