Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.27.8

Keywords:

Seismic-resistant design, Dynamic analysis, Vibration periods, Design spectrum

Abstract

The comparative analysis focuses on investigating the discrepancies between the E.030 regulations of 2003 and 2018 in relation to anti-seismic design. This study is carried out in the context of structural wall structures intended for an Educational Center located in the city of La Libertad. Several important aspects are contrasted, such as vibration periods, percentage of participating mass, design spectrum, deformation and various forces, such as static and dynamic basal shear force, in addition to maximum design forces, such as moment bending, shear and axial force.
Using the Etabs v.20 software to model the structures, significant variations in the results were observed when applying the standards according to the year 2003 and 2018. It is relevant to note that the 2018 regulations produce intermediate results in terms of modal periods for both. structures, both in static and dynamic analysis. In summary, it is shown that changes in regulations have a notable influence on the design and seismic response of structures, especially those with irregularities, and it is essential to take these aspects into account when carrying out structural analysis and design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

J. Yepez, «“Desempeño sismico de edificaciones esenciales",» Propues.Vis. 2000, vol. 65, pp. 65-86, 1996.

C. &. C. a. H. Tavera, «“ÁREAS PROBABLES DE RUPTURA SÍSMICA EN EL BORDE OCCIDENTAL DEL PERÚ, A PARTIR DE LA VARIACIÓN DEL PARÁMETRO ‘b,’”,» Soc. Geol. del Perú SGP,, vol. 36, nº 1997, pp. 23-36, 2006.

N.T.E, «“Norma técnica de edificación",» SENCICO, pp. 1-45, 2003.

R.N.E, «“RM-355-2018-VIVIENDA",» SENCICO, 2018.

L. Z. C. B. a. S. D. S. L. S. Hampshire De C. Santos, «“Comparative Study of Codes for Seismic Design of Structures,”,» Math. Model. Civ., vol. 9, nº 1, pp. 1-12, 2013.

D. L. C. A. R. R. Y. R. Jorge Eduardo, «ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DEL DISEÑO ESTRUCTURAL DE UNA EDIFICACIÓN REGULAR E IRREGULAR DE,» de ANÁLISIS COMPARATIVO DEL DISEÑO ESTRUCTURAL DE UNA EDIFICACIÓN REGULAR E IRREGULAR DE, Lima, Revista Gaceta Técnica., 2021, p. 24.

M. H. G. M. S. D. León Ingaruca, «PUCP,» de Comparación estructural y económica de edificio de 7 pisos ante cambio de la norma E.030 diseño sismorresistente, Lima, PUCP, 2018, p. 91.

E. R. Mejia Ruiz y H. O. Tintaya Landeo, «EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO SÍSMICO MEDIANTE UN ANÁLISIS ESTÁTICO NO LINEAL DE UNA EDIFICACIÓN ESENCIAL DESTINADA A SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN LA CIUDAD DE LIMA,» de EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO SÍSMICO MEDIANTE UN ANÁLISIS ESTÁTICO NO LINEAL DE UNA EDIFICACIÓN ESENCIAL DESTINADA A SERVICIOS DE SALUD EN LA CIUDAD DE LIMA, Lima, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC), 2024, pp. 65-89.

Gonzales Hualpa, Teobaldo Santiago y Reyes Lazo, Erick Ferrer, «Análisis y diseño estructural sismo resistente de un centro comercial de 5 niveles ubicado en Trujillo – La Libertad,» de Análisis y diseño estructural sismo resistente de un centro comercial de 5 niveles ubicado en Trujillo – La Libertad, Trujillo, Reposorio de la UCV, 2022.

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

[1]
M. J. Rupay Vargas, R. R. Parra Lavado, and J. S. López Yarango, “Earthquake Resistant Design of a Structural Wall System applying Standard E.030 of 2003 and 2018 in the City of La Libertad”, Memoria investig. ing. (Facultad Ing., Univ. Montev.), no. 27, pp. 110–128, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)