Reflexiones sobre la nueva convención de las Naciones Unidas sobre los acuerdos de transacción internacionales resultantes de la mediación (“Convención de Singapur”)

Ignacio Jorge Tasende Iturvide

doi:10.47274/DERUM/37.4

Authors

Ignacio Jorge Tasende Iturvide Universidad de la República, Uruguay https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3728-6394

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47274/DERUM/37.4

Keywords:

Mediation, Singapore, Agreements, Conciliation, Arbitration

Abstract

This article will analyze the reasons that justified the creation of the Singapore Convention and its positive consequences. In particular, it will address the nature of the agreements, their effects, the requirements for their validity, their enforceability, and the grounds for refusal of measures contained in the agreement. Furthermore, it will also assess the links with the New York Convention and the relationship between mediation agreements and State courts. Finally, it will conclude highlighting the impact that the instrument may have at the global level, and its possible repercussions in the field of alternative dispute resolution methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALFONSÍN, Q., Teoría del Derecho Privado Internacional, Ed. Idea, Montevideo, 1982.

BARROS, E., GERMAIN, A., Los conflictos de interés en el arbitraje internacional, Centro de Arbitraje y Mediación de Santiago, 2015, disponible en: http://www.camsantiago.cl/articulos_online/internacional.html.

CAVERS, D., But lawyers are a rule-making sect, Selected Reading son Conflict of Laws, Sto. Paul, Minn., 1956.

ESPLUGUES, C., La Convención de Singapur de 2018 sobre mediación y la creación de un título deslocalizado dotado de fuerza ejecutiva: una apuesta novedosa, y un mal relato, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 2020/1.

FRESNEDO, C., Curso de Derecho Internacional Privado, T. I, Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, Montevideo, 2004.

GARCIMARTÍN ALFEREZ, F., Derecho internacional privado, 2° ed., Civitas, Cizur Menor, 2014.

GOLDSCHMIDT, W., Sistema y Filosofía del Derecho internacional privado, T. I, Ediciones Jurídicas Europa-América, Madrid, 1952.

LANDÁEZ, L., LANDÁEZ, N., La equivalencia funcional, la neutralidad tecnológica y la libertad informática, Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Políticas, N° 3, Caracas, 2007.

PEREZNIETO, L., Derecho internacional privado, 10° ed., Oxford University Press, México, 2015.

PRIBETIC, A.I., The “Third Option”: International Commercial Mediation, World Arbitration & Mediation Review, Vol. 1, núm. 4, 2007.

STIPANOWICH, TH.J., LAMARE, J.R., Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Management in Fortune 1,000 Companies, Harv. Negot. L.Rev., Vol. 19, 2014.

STRONG, S.I., Realizing Rationality: An Empirical Assessment of International Commercial Mediation, Wash. & Lee L. Rev., Vol. 73, 2016.

WOLSKI, B., Arb-Med-Arb (and MSAs): A Whole Which Is Less Than, Not Greater Than, the Sum of Its Parts, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 6, núm. 2, 2013.