Potential grievance in uruguayan law

its admissibility and basis

Authors

Keywords:

Grievance, Adherence, Appeal, Potential, Means fo challenge

Abstract

The purpose of this essay is to carry out a brief analysis of what potential grievance is, its concept, legitimacy and basis. In this sense, it is possible to anticipate that although it is not specifically regulated, both scholars and courts admit it practically without hesitation, allowing it in certain procedural opportunities. This concept has a double basis: legal and philosophical. Although there is no written provision, from the rules regulating the  eans of challenging decisions, it is possible to firmly conclude its legitimacy, always keeping in mind that it cannot be indiscriminately brought for consideration and it shall depend on the circumstances of the case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sebastián Barreira Morosoli, Estudio Jurídico Durán-Clérici, Montevideo, Uruguay

Doctor in Law graduated from the Faculty of Law of the Universidad de Montevideo. Aspiring Professor Assistant Professor of Procedural Law at the Universidad de Montevideo Law School. Member of the Uruguayan Association of Procedural Law "Eduardo J. Couture. Member of the Durán-Clérici Law Firm.

Published

2019-12-02

How to Cite

Barreira Morosoli, S. (2019). Potential grievance in uruguayan law: its admissibility and basis. Revista De Derecho, 18(36), 11–24. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.edu.uy/index.php/revistaderecho/article/view/396

Issue

Section

Doctrine