Application of Six Sigma Methodology for Enhancement of Soft Plastic Extrusion Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36561/ING.28.14Keywords:
Gasket manufacturing, DMAIC methodology, Six sigma, Process optimization, waste reduction, sustainable production, ANOVA, Statistical process controlAbstract
The gasket manufacturing process in “Company A” faced significant challenges and inefficiencies because of high rejection rates and variation in extrusion machine, magnetic insertion machine and welding machine’s performance. All three machines were consistently generating major rejections on a daily basis including a high volume of purging rejections from the PVC soft extrusion machine, excessive trimming of oversized magnets during the magnetic insertion process, and significant rejection due to poor joint strength in the welding process of PVC profiles. In order to address these underlying issues, Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) methodology was employed in order to decrease rejection/waste, increase process efficiency and decrease defects of all three machines. The study involved process mapping, cause and effect analysis, quality function deployment (QFD) and statistical process tools such as ANOVA, regression and Cp/Cpk analysis. Root causes were identified and targeted improvements based on the data were introduced including optimized production planning, machine parameter optimization and standardization, improvement of production execution planning and storage availability, temperature controls on welding machines and encoder wheel knurling for magnetic insertion machine. The main objectives were to deal with problems including material waste, variance in magnetic strip size, issues in welding machines and frequent machine stoppages caused by improper production scheduling because of improper availability of storage space for batch production independent of door pre-assembly plan. Following implementation, results show a considerable decrease in extrusion machine rejection %age from 12% to 4.06%, a reduction in purging waste from 17 kg/day to 6.9 kg/day and an increase in machine efficiency from 50.1% to 83.3%. Furthermore, welding machine rejection %age fell from 7% to 3.7% as a result of enhanced temperature management and equipment maintenance. Size variation issue in magnet insertion machine was resolved by knurling of encoder wheel. Overall, these changes resulted in an annual cost savings of roughly 1.5 million PKR for the extrusion process and 1.2 million from magnet insertion machine. The significance of this project originates from its potential to streamline the gasket production process by reducing waste and faults while increasing machine efficiency. The results offer a replicable framework that can be employed across wide range of manufacturing industries for quality improvement and cost optimization.
Downloads
References
A Paramasivam, P. V. (2022). Manufacturing process rejection analysis of heavy duty gear reduction starter motor. Materials Today: Proceedings, 59(2), 1295-1300. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.520
Alarcón, F., Calero, M., Pérez-Huertas, S., & Martín-Lara, M. (2023). State of the Art of Lean Six Sigma and Its Implementation in Chemical Manufacturing Industry Using a Bibliometric Perspective. applied sciences, 13(12). doi:doi.org/10.3390/app13127022
Amaral, M. T. (2022). Growth curves with multivariate θ generalized normal distribution for cardiac dysfunction in rats. Communications in Statistics: Case Studies, Data Analysis and Applications, 6(2), 615-627. doi:doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2020.1752848
Araman, H. a. (2023). A case study on implementing Lean Six Sigma: DMAIC methodology in aluminum profiles extrusion process. The TQM Journal, 35(2), 337-365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2021-0154
Bailey, D. C.-L. (2016). Challenging the age of austerity: Disruptive agency after the global economic crisis. Comparative European Politics, 16, 9-31. doi:doi.org/10.1057/s41295-016-0072-8
Guoqiang Liu, G. Y. (2020). Research on test method of heat transfer coefficient for refrigerator gasket. International Journal of Refrigeration, 110, 106-120. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.11.007
Guoqiang Liu, G. Y. (2021). A review of refrigerator gasket: Development trend, heat and mass transfer characteristics, structure and material optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110975
Hill, J. T.-J.-K. (2017). The implementation of a Lean Six Sigma framework to enhance operational performance in an MRO facility. Production & Manufacturing Research, 6(1), 26-48. doi:doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1417179
Jaime Macias-Aguayo, L. G.-C. (2022). Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma Integration: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers. Applied sciences, 12(22). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211321
Lewandowski, K., & Skórczewska, K. (2022). A Brief Review of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Recycling. polymers, 14(15). doi:doi.org/10.3390/polym14153035
LM, M. (2022). Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control (DMAIC) Methodology as a Roadmap in Quality Improvement. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 5(2), 44-46. doi:doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-22-X2
Macias-Aguayo, J., Garcia-Castro, L., Barcia, K., McFarlane, D., & Abad-Moran, J. (2022). Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma Integration: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers. applied sciences, 12(22). doi:doi.org/10.3390/app122211321
McDermott, O., Antony, J., Bhat, S., Jayaraman, R., Rosa, A., Marolla, G., & Parida, R. (2022). Lean Six Sigma in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review on Challenges, Organisational Readiness and Critical Success Factors. processes, 10(10). doi:doi.org/10.3390/pr10101945
Monika Smętkowska, B. M. (2018). Using Six Sigma DMAIC to Improve the Quality of the Production Process: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 590-596. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.039
Monika Smętkowska, B. M. (2018). Using Six Sigma DMAIC to Improve the Quality of the Production Process: A Case Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 590-596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.039
Most. Asikha Aktar, M. M.-A. (2021). Global economic crisis, energy use, CO2 emissions, and policy roadmap amid COVID-19. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 770-781. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029
Muraliraj, J. Z. (n.d.). Annotated methodological review of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(1), 2-49. doi:doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2017-0028
Ndrecaj, V., Mohamed Hashim, M., Mason-Jones, R., Ndou, V., & Tlemsani, I. (2023). Exploring Lean Six Sigma as Dynamic Capability to Enable Sustainable Performance Optimisation in Times of Uncertainty. sustainability, 15(23). doi:doi.org/10.3390/su152316542
Noori, B. a. (2018). Development of Six Sigma methodology to improve grinding processes: A change management approach. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(1), 50-63. doi:doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2016-0074
Patel, A. a. (2021). Critical review of literature on Lean Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(3), 627-674. doi:doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-04-2020-0043
Raman Sharma, P. G. (2018). SIX SIGMA DMAIC METHODOLOGY IMPLEMENTATION IN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY. Journal of manufacturing engineering, 13(1), 42-50.
S. Reosekar, R. a. (n.d.). Six Sigma methodology: a structured review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5(4), 392-422. doi:doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2013-0059
T. Costa, F. S. (2017). Improve the extrusion process in tire production using six sigma methodology. (1104-1111, Ed.) Procedia manufacturing, 13. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.171
T. Costa, F. S. (2017). Improve the extrusion process in tire production using Six Sigma methodology. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1104-1111. doi:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917308090
Tianyang Zhao, G. L. (2024). Effect of structural improvement of gaskets on the heat leakage load and energy consumption of the refrigerator. Energy, 300. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131430
Tjahjono, B. B. (2010). Six Sigma: a literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(3). doi:doi.org/10.1108/20401461011075017
Wasage, C. (2016). Implementation of Six Sigma Projects in Fortune 500 companies. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 12(4), 208-216. doi:doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2016.04.002
Yang C-C, J. Y.-T.-C. (2022). The Development of the New Process of Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) and Its Application. Sustainability, 14(15). doi:doi.org/10.3390/su14159294